Sustainable Education and Digital Transformation
Pre-service physical science teachers’ self-efficacy for sustainable digital pedagogy: Evidence from teaching practice after emergency blended learning
Lereko Gerard Mohafa 1 * , Mamohato Makhechane 1, Makomosela Qhobela 1
More Detail
1 Department of Science Education, National University of Lesotho, Lesotho
* Corresponding Author
Open Access Full Text (PDF)
ARTICLE INFO

Sustainable Education and Digital Transformation, 2026 - Volume 1 Issue 2, Article No: e43696
https://doi.org/10.33902/SEDT.202643696

Article Type: Research Article

Published Online: 08 Mar 2026

Views: 230 | Downloads: 88

ABSTRACT
Teacher self-efficacy is a critical component of sustainable teacher preparation, shaping confidence in planning, instruction, and reflective practice. During the COVID-19 period, a local university implemented blended teaching and learning under rapid digital transition conditions, creating a context for professional learning in digitally mediated environments. Through a concurrent mixed methods approach, this study sought to establish the self-efficacy of conveniently sampled physical science pre-service teachers (n = 16) during teaching practice post-blended learning experience. Data were collected using a questionnaire followed by interviews. Quantitative data were analysed to establish overall strength of sources contributing to perceived self-efficacy of participants. Sources’ contribution strengths were recorded as above average for own experiences and vicarious experiences, average for verbal persuasion, and below average for emotional arousal. Content analysis was used on qualitative data responses to unveil explanations associated with the contribution strengths of sources of perceived self-efficacy. The findings indicate that blended learning can support pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy development and help make teaching practice more manageable despite reported challenges. The study discusses implications for strengthening sustainable digital transition in science teacher education through structured practice opportunities, modelling, feedback, and supportive conditions that enable resilient professional learning. The study recommends that teacher training institutions need to strengthen PSTs’ self-efficacy by prioritizing real classroom exposure through direct teaching, school visits, and practical lesson planning. They are encouraged to integrate online audio-visual resources and blended learning approaches to extend PSTs’ understanding of authentic classroom dynamics. Future research across diverse contexts could examine how planned blended learning influences PSTs’ professional preparation.
KEYWORDS
blended learning digital pedagogy physical science teacher preparation pre-service teacher education sustainable teacher development teacher self-efficacy teaching practice
In-text citation: (Mohafa et al., 2026)
Reference: Mohafa, L. G., Makhechane, M., & Qhobela, M. (2026). Pre-service physical science teachers’ self-efficacy for sustainable digital pedagogy: Evidence from teaching practice after emergency blended learning. Sustainable Education and Digital Transformation, 1(2), e43696. https://doi.org/10.33902/SEDT.202643696
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Mohafa LG, Makhechane M, Qhobela M. Pre-service physical science teachers’ self-efficacy for sustainable digital pedagogy: Evidence from teaching practice after emergency blended learning. Sustainable Education and Digital Transformation. 2026;1(2), e43696. https://doi.org/10.33902/SEDT.202643696
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Mohafa LG, Makhechane M, Qhobela M. Pre-service physical science teachers’ self-efficacy for sustainable digital pedagogy: Evidence from teaching practice after emergency blended learning. Sustainable Education and Digital Transformation. 2026;1(2):e43696. https://doi.org/10.33902/SEDT.202643696
In-text citation: (Mohafa et al., 2026)
Reference: Mohafa, Lereko Gerard, Mamohato Makhechane, and Makomosela Qhobela. "Pre-service physical science teachers’ self-efficacy for sustainable digital pedagogy: Evidence from teaching practice after emergency blended learning". Sustainable Education and Digital Transformation 2026 1 no. 2 (2026): e43696. https://doi.org/10.33902/SEDT.202643696
In-text citation: (Mohafa et al., 2026)
Reference: Mohafa, L. G., Makhechane, M., and Qhobela, M. (2026). Pre-service physical science teachers’ self-efficacy for sustainable digital pedagogy: Evidence from teaching practice after emergency blended learning. Sustainable Education and Digital Transformation, 1(2), e43696. https://doi.org/10.33902/SEDT.202643696
In-text citation: (Mohafa et al., 2026)
Reference: Mohafa, Lereko Gerard et al. "Pre-service physical science teachers’ self-efficacy for sustainable digital pedagogy: Evidence from teaching practice after emergency blended learning". Sustainable Education and Digital Transformation, vol. 1, no. 2, 2026, e43696. https://doi.org/10.33902/SEDT.202643696
REFERENCES
  • Altaş, E. A., & Babacan, T. (2025). From training to transformation: The impact of online ICT training on Turkish EFL teachers’ TPACK competences and innovative teaching practices. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 9(4), 173-201. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202535200
  • Atmacasoy, A., & Aksu, M. (2018). Blended learning at pre-service teacher education in Turkey: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 2399-2422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9723-5
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  • Bandura, A. (1988). Self-regulation of motivation and action through goal systems. In Hamilton V., Bower G. H., & Frijda N. H. (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on emotion and motivation (pp. 37–61). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2792-6_2
  • Bandura, A. (2000). Self-efficacy: The foundation of agency. In W. J. Perrig & A. Grob (Eds.), Control of human behavior, mental processes, and consciousness: Essays in honor of the 60th birthday of August Flammer (pp. 17–33). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Bandura, A., & Wessels, S. (1997). Self-efficacy. Cambridge University Press.
  • Clark, S., & Newberry, M. (2019). Are we building pre-service teacher self-efficacy? A large-scale study examining teacher education experiences. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 47(1), 32-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2018.1497772
  • Colson, T., Sparks, K., Berridge, G., Frimming, R., & Willis, C. (2017). Pre-service teachers and self-efficacy: A study in contrast. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 8(2), 66-76. https://doi.org/10.1515/dcse-2017-0016
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
  • Emiru, E. K., & Gedifew, M. T. (2024). The effect of teacher self-efficacy on learning engagement of secondary school students. Cogent Education, 11(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2308432
  • Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7(3), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001
  • Flower, A., McKenna, J. W., & Haring, C. D. (2017). Behavior and classroom management: Are teacher preparation programs really preparing our teachers? Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61(2), 163-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2016.1231109
  • Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., Tigelaar, E. H., Van Rijswijk, M. M., & Jansen, E. P. W. A. (2024). Preservice teachers’ resilience during times of COVID-19. Teachers and Teaching, 30(7-8), 1083-1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2023.2172391
  • Forman, J., & Damschroder, L. (2007). Qualitative content analysis. In L. Jacoby & L. A. Siminoff (Eds.), Empirical methods for bioethics: A primer (pp. 39-62). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3709(07)11003-7
  • Garza, R., Werner, P., & Wendler, L. F. (2016). Transitioning from student to professional: pre-service teachers' perceptions. New Waves-Educational Research and Development Journal, 19(2), 19-35.
  • Gasmi, A. A. (2022). Through the lens of students: how online discussion forums affect students' learning. International Journal of Technology in Education, 5(4), 669-684. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.291
  • Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183-211. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1992.4279530
  • Glackin, M., & Hohenstein, J. (2018). Teachers’ self-efficacy: Progressing qualitative analysis. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 41(3), 271-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1295940
  • Golubtchik, L. (2024). Increasing teacher retention by improving self-efficacy and classroom management skills in pre-service teachers. Journal of Education and Learning, 13(4), 1-17.
  • Heng, Q., & Chu, L. (2023). Self-efficacy, reflection, and resilience as predictors of work engagement among English teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1160681. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1160681
  • Inel Ekici, D. (2018). Development of pre-service teachers’ teaching self-efficacy beliefs through an online community of practice. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19, 27-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-017-9511-8
  • Jakopovic, P., Karpf, A., Lemke, J., & McGlamery, S. (2023). The impact of microteach experiences on pre-service teachers' self-efficacy development. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 90(1), 28–41.
  • Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. B. (2020). Educational research: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (7th ed.). Sage.
  • Kılıç, A. (2022). The impact of reflective practices on pre-service science teachers’ classroom teaching practices. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(1), 152-170. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2022175781
  • Lazarides, R., & Warner, L. M. (2020). Teacher self-efficacy: Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.890
  • Lippke, S. (2020). Self-efficacy. In V. Zeigler-Hill, & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 4722-4727). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1165
  • Ma, K., & Cavanagh, M. S. (2018). Classroom ready? Pre-service teachers' self-efficacy for their first professional experience placement. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(7), 134-151. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n7.8
  • Makhechane, M., & Qhobela, M. (2019). Understanding how chemistry teachers transform stoichiometry concepts at secondary level in Lesotho. South African Journal of Chemistry, 72, 59-66. https://doi.org/10.17159/0379-4350/2019/v72a9
  • Makumane, M. A. (2021). Students’ perceptions on the use of LMS at a Lesotho university amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. African Identities, 21(2), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2021.1898930
  • Martins, M., Costa, J., & Onofre, M. (2015). Practicum experiences as sources of pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2), 263-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2014.968705
  • Menon, D., & Sadler, T. D. (2018). Sources of science teaching self-efficacy for preservice elementary teachers in science content courses. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(5), 835-855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9813-7
  • Mohafa, L. G., Qhobela, M., & George, M. J. (2022). Evaluating the influence of interactive simulations on learners’ academic performance in stoichiometry. South African Journal of Chemistry, 76, 01-08. https://doi.org/10.17159/0379-4350/2022/v76a01
  • Mohafa, L., & George, M.J. (2023). Assessing pre-service science teachers’ perceptions about online teaching and learning. International Journal of Scholars Education, 6(1), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.52134/ueader.1245351
  • Morris, D. B., Usher, E. L., & Chen, J. A. (2017). Reconceptualising the sources of teaching self-efficacy: A critical review of emerging literature. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 795-833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9378-y
  • Ogunniyi, M. B., & Rollnick, M. (2015). Pre-service science teacher education in Africa: Prospects and challenges. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(1), 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9415-y
  • Pandee, M., Tepsuriwong, S., & Darasawang, P. (2020). The dynamic state of pre-service teachers' self-efficacy: A critical incident study in Thailand. Issues in Educational Research, 30(4), 1442-1462.
  • Pfitzner-Eden, F. (2016). Why do I feel more confident? Bandura's sources predict pre-service teachers' latent changes in teacher self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1486. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01486
  • Shu, H., & Gu, X. (2018). Determining the differences between online and face-to-face student–group interactions in a blended learning course. The Internet and Higher Education, 39, 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.05.003
  • Velthuis, C., Fisser, P., & Pieters, J. (2014). Teacher training and pre-service primary teachers’ self-efficacy for science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(4), 445-464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9363-y
  • Yılmaz, Ö., & Malone, K. L. (2020). Pre-service teachers perceptions about the use of blended learning in a science education methods course. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00126-7
  • Yurekli, B., Işıksal-Bostanb M. & Çakıroğlu, E. (2020) Sources of pre-service teachers' self-efficacy in the context of a mathematics teaching methods course. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(5), 631-645. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1777068
  • Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981-1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801
LICENSE
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.